Login

Netgear HDX101 Powerline Adapters Don't Measure Up PDF Print E-mail
Home Networking Reviews
Written by Greg Keene   
Wednesday, 01 November 2006

Not RecommendedNetgear HDX101Netgear products have a long-standing position in my network. I'm especially fond of their ProSafe line of Ethernet switches. So when Netgear announced the HDX101 200Mbps Powerline solution for bridging unwired rooms in a home, I couldn't wait to get my hands on it. Unfortunately, it simply doesn't work – unless by coincidence the rooms use the same power circuit in your home. Even then, it doesn't measure up to its own specs or to competitive technologies such as WiFi. For high bandwidth uses like HD video, it's out of the question.

Read more for details.




Review Category

Score

Features

4

Performance

0

Ease of Use

5

Installation/Setup

5

Build Quality/Reliability

3

Customer Support

3

Price

5

Total

3.57/10

The concept of powerline networking is to use your home's electrical wiring to bridge your network. For example, if you have an unwired room in your home, you can plug a powerline adapter into an outlet in that room and plug-in a powerline adapter in another room that is wired to your network. Powerline adapters are designed to bridge between the two rooms. As you can imagine, this could be really useful in most homes since odds are most homes have an area that isn't connected. Perhaps today you're using wireless to connect that area using a wireless bridge or similar. However, if you want to stream video or desire network speed similar to your wired network, 802.11g WiFi isn't up to the job.

Powerline devices have been around for a few years and these new Netgear units represent the latest in speed and capability. Based on prior testing, we've yet to see a unit that matches the maximum on-the-box specifications. But, we've never seen any networking gear that will match the maximum rates – wireless, wired, etc. – all fall short. With powerline, the quality of the connection between the units will vary greatly depending on the outlets into which they're plugged, the quality of the circuits, and what else is active on that circuit.

On the Netgear site, the HDX101 description includes: "...turn any electrical outlet into a Home Network connection and share a Broadband Internet connection, files and printers with PCs in different rooms without running any new cabling..." When I began my review of the HDX101, that's how I approached it. Rather than test in a lab, I decided to try to connect a bedroom in my eight-year-old home where I currently use an 802.11g wireless bridge to connect to the rest of our network. For video streaming, today's 802.11g WiFi solutions are less than optimal and I was looking for improvement.

Setup and Configuration

Included in the $249.00 ($199 street) package are two HDX101 adapters, two Ethernet patch cords, CD and user manual.

Powerline Networking Diagram
Powerline Networking Diagram

First, I connected one HDX101 to power and the network switch in that bedroom (which is only used for devices in that bedroom such as TiVo and Slingbox) and then connected another to power and the main network in the garage. I installed the Windows-only HDX101 configuration software and immediately saw both devices. Unfortunately, the speed was 2Mbps TX (transmit) and 4Mbps RX (receive) – much slower than 802.11g WiFi. I changed the configuration from "co-exist with HomePlug devices" to "only HDX101." The speed improved to 4Mbps TX and 4Mbps RX. While I never expected 200Mbps, I was hoping for a reliable 30Mbps to 50Mbps. So far, we're not even close.

Powerline requires a clean power connection between the two adapters. For example, you should not plug powerline devices into power strips, UPS devices, etc. They must be plugged directly into a wall outlet.

With such bad performance, I decided to get down to basics. I moved the bedroom adapter to the garage to assure that I had working units. With both of the powerline units in the same room, on the same circuit, the configuration software reported substantially improved results of 174Mbps TX and 200Mbps RX. However, as you'll see in the Real-world Performance section below, those numbers don't reflect real-world results.

Support Call

With such inconsistent results, I decided to contact Netgear tech support to be sure I wasn't missing something. Unfortunately, that experience wasn't up-to-par. The representative at the other end was clearly going through a script asking obviously unrelated questions including "who is your ISP." I was then put on hold for about 15 minutes while he "checked his other resources." When he came back, we went through a number of questions including changing out computers – just in case. At the end of the call he said that according to his resources: "Netgear only recommends and supports powerline units that are on the same powerline." While I can imagine a position that says "your mileage may vary depending on your home," their inability to support a basic home configuration sounded crazy. So, I pushed a bit more thinking perhaps he thought I was crossing electrical panels or something. Nope. The powerline units must actually be on the same circuit breaker or Netgear won't support it. I'm not sure how your house is wired, but mine is wired to segregate areas of the house and types of switches and outlets. With over 40 circuits, getting a plug in the garage on the same circuit as one in the bedroom is insanely unrealistic.

Real-world Performance

Still wanting to know the limits of the device for other setups, I started moving the units around my house. What I found is that the performance varied substantially. No setting was as strong as plugging both units into the same garage circuit, but I did see some improvement from the 4Mbps I had in the bedroom.

Configuration

Receive File

Send File

Wired Ethernet
Gigabit Ethernet – 1000Mpbs rated

48 seconds
135.83Mbps

50 seconds
130.39Mbps

WiFi
802.11g – 54Mbps rated

350 seconds (nearly 6 minutes)
18.63Mbps

370 seconds (just over 6 minutes)
17.62Mbps

Garage-Same
Netgear software rating:
200Mbps RX, 174Mbps TX

343 seconds (nearly 6 minutes)
19.01Mbps

393 seconds (over 6 1/2 minutes)
16.59Mbps

Garage-Bedroom
Netgear software rating:
4Mbps RX, 4Mbps TX

3,434 seconds (over 57 minutes)
1.9Mbps

3,750 seconds (over 62 minutes)
1.74Mbps

Theater-Bedroom
Netgear software rating:
39Mbps RX, 29Mbps TX

485 seconds (over 8 minutes), 13.44Mbps

656 seconds (nearly 10 minutes), 9.94Mbps


Wired Ethernet Network – Gigabit
I used my standard wired Ethernet network connection as a baseline. Since HD video was the focus of the product, I decided to use a large (854,537,054 bytes) MPEG4 1920x1080p video file as the benchmark. It took less than a minute to copy the 10 minute video to or from the NAS (network attached storage device). The file also streamed perfectly from the NAS without stutter or error.

WiFi – 802.11g (4-5 bars)
I also included a WiFi connection in the mix to use as comparison. I was able to copy the file to or from the NAS in about 6 minutes. Remotely streaming the file exhibited some stutters and pauses, but no failures.

Garage-Same
As a best-case baseline, I ran my test using a configuration that wouldn't provide me any value. Both powerline connections in the same room – the garage. Even in this optimal configuration, I didn't achieve even close to the specifications or the Mbps displayed by the configuration software. Remotely streaming the video file from the NAS exhibited a few stutters and pauses – about as good as the average WiFi connection.

Garage-Bedroom
As you can imagine, the real-world tests in this configuration were abysmal. Not only was I unable to stream local HD video at this speed, but my ISP receive speed is about five times as fast. Taking an hour to copy an 10 minute video file just doesn't cut it.

Theater-Bedroom
When moving the main connection to my home theater room and leaving the remote unit in the bedroom, the performance improved somewhat. I repeated this test a few times and the best results were the ones in the table above. Streaming the file wasn't perfect. The file stuttered, skipped and jumped with more than one failure. It performed no better than my average WiFi connections. Based on that, I wouldn't replace the wireless bridge with the HDX101 setup.

Pros

  • Easy configuration

Cons

  • Performance sub-standard even on with the best scenario
  • Performance far below rates specified
  • Performance inconsistent on same outlets over time
  • Performance substantially different on different outlets throughout the house
  • Windows-only configuration software

Conclusion

Overall, there wasn't a single powerline configuration that would work for me. I found the performance unacceptable for my desired use and inconsistent under every configuration tested. Our grades in each category are sullied by the fact that the performance is unacceptable. We can't give a rating above five on any category if the device just plain doesn't work. It's too bad, I'm such a Netgear fan, I wanted the HDX101 Powerline adapters to fill a real need. Performance in your home may vary and could even work better. However, based on our results, we can't recommend the HDX101 to anyone for any purpose.

Trackback(0)
Comments (22)add comment

squog said:

 
Same results here. Wired connection gives me 95Mbps transfer rate (tested using netperf) while HDX101 gives only from 2 to 5Mbps.
In another test, 875MB file copied with average speed of 10.3Mbps.

I will be returning my HDX101 tomorrow.
November 21, 2006

TechDigs.net said:

 
Squog: sadly, they're just not ready for prime time yet.
November 21, 2006

Nerdly said:

 
Did you make sure the Powerline Mode Option was "Only HDX101" for both devices? (The UI doesn't make it clear, but I believe you are only setting the mode of the local device when you change that.) Also, did you upgrade to the 1.1 firmware (a.k.a. spirit_dh10p_9010_v2-s2_0_21_coex_01_cvs.ftp)?

I've tried both these steps and still get highly variable ping times (1 ms to 2000+ ms) and poor bandwidth ~4Mbs. However, I haven't tried messing with the circuits, like you did.
February 03, 2007

Guillaume Boudreau said:

 
I just found your review. I had pretty similar (read horrible) results with my HDXB101. I documented my experience on my personal website: http://www.pommepause.com/online/hdx101.html.
April 15, 2007

TechDigs.net said:

 
Guillaume Boudreau:

Glad you found us. Sorry, you didn't find it before you had to go through your own trials. Unfortunately, Homeplug Power Alliance-based networking isn't ready to replace CAT5. We're still planning on trying a few new technologies, but we're skeptical.
April 16, 2007

Stu2j said:

 
I am rather amazed by these results.

I needed to stream video from the office hub all the way to the home theater on the other side of the house (Showcenter media player) and running cat5 wasn't a good option.

I tried wireless but quite frankly, streaming video with wireless just doesn't cut it (although music, photos, etc work fine).

Finally I grabbed an HDX101 kit in a last ditch effort to get it to work and haven't looked back. I get consistent 40-45 mbps tx and 35-40 rx on a rock solid connection and video (and everything else) streams without a hitch.

So for some of us, it not only works, it works extremely well.

May 22, 2007

Deluxe247 said:

 
My cable modem and NAS are upstairs where most of my devices are downstairs, the traditional wrieless solution sucks big time and the connection was so bad in my bedroom, it simply felt like using dial up. I bought a cheap pair of 85Mbps Airlink powerline adpator for 60 bucks. It works like a charm with zero software installation. From my bedroom, I can view smaller rmvb files and even 2G avi files stored in my NAS upstairs without any problem.
June 06, 2007

TechDigs.net said:

 
Stu2j:

In our tests in an number of environments, we found substantial troubles. Based on comments here and reviews through out the net, we're not alone. We're very pleased to hear someone had good results. Unfortunately, we can't replicate those results.
June 11, 2007

Lisa said:

 
You´ve got me worried now! I´ve just ordered a some of these and subsequently found this site. I live in Spain, have tiled floors and the walls can be pretty thick. I therefore thought this would be a good option. They should arrive next Tue/Wed - wish me luck please!!
June 14, 2007

Stu2j said:

 
>>>In our tests in an number of environments

I only tested in my environment which is a large single family home streaming video from one side to the other and it works just great. Not a single video hiccup since installing the HDX101.

>>>Based on comments here and reviews through out the net, we're not alone.

I've read a lot of reviews on this product and I don't recall reading any others that had results as bad as this:

"the speed was 2Mbps TX (transmit) and 4Mbps RX (receive)"

I had better results than that using 85s (which are really only good for data) and don't recall those ever dropping that low. Something is clearly wrong...

I'm not even a fan of Netgear (preferring Hawking network products) but when it comes to the HDX101... I'm a huge fan. My computer acts as a PVR and it's pretty useless unless I can get the video to the home theater. The HDX101 enabled me to do just that.

I'm not doubting your results but your review could put off folks for whom (like me) this would be an excellent solution.
June 20, 2007

Stu2j said:

 
Hey guys.. try this...

I read an online review where someone said that they (the powerline adapters) didn't work well until they plugged them into a switch instead of directly into their router.

Interestingly, this is my configuration. The HDX101 is plugged into a hub/switch which is plugged into the broadband router. As a test, I plugged the HDX101 directly into the broadband router and performance went straight to h***.

I have no idea why this would be the case, if it applies only in specific situations, with specific routers, etc. However, I did find it interesting...
June 27, 2007

matt said:

 
I too have had great results with this product. I have 4 of them being used to network my PVR together. I have found that the age of the house has ALOT to do with it. For some reason the newer houses don't work as well as the older ones. My house is 15 years old and it works great, another house 2 years old that I tried them in couldn't get above 5Mbps. These were using the same devices. It all depends on your wiring.
July 06, 2007

Dave said:

 
Hi - thanks to all for your comments and comprehensive testing. I have just bought a pair of Netgear HDXB101s. I am about to try them in my house in France - which is a B&B. My place has 3 floors and currently I have 8 wireless repeaters (its a big place!) - they are Apple Airport Expresses (great for Itunes music streaming) and are setup in a WDS (ie all packets are repeated everywhere, as I need my guests to be able to maintain a session if they move around). The sheer number of repeaters affects wifi connections speeds so I am going to re-configure the topology to with the HD101s. The house wiring is 100 years old and I have a 3 phase power circuit - 1 per floor! So I will run CAT6 cable where I can. I also bought a NetGear 1GB switch so I wont use the switch part of the Router. I know 1Gb is massive overspec but these things are cheap these days. What is the best freeware connection speed s/w to use? I will let you guys know how it all works - or doesn't.
October 03, 2007

Dave said:

 
Sorry - one other thing. I am trying my 2 new HDXB101s in an old house in central London right now (before installing them in France). My Blue link lights are flashing randomly but I can browse the web no problem. Does that mean the wiring has problems or there is a fridge or something disturbing the connection? I haven't seen anyone mention the Blue lights flash - and the instructions seem to say the connection light should be solid? cheers Dave (I can't run my config utility yet as I only have a MAC with me!)
October 03, 2007

Rob said:

 
Dave

Regarding the flashing blue light, this seems to be an indication of activity on the Powerline network, as opposed to a Powerline problem. This 'feature' changed -- from what is written in the manual -- in one of the firmware updates. Netgear simply haven't updated the manual.

I've got four of these and find them superb, worst case is 40-45Mbps, best is around 90Mbps.

Regarding the review. The success of Powerline seems to be in the quality of your home wiring, the home appliances you use and ... luck! To cut down on 'noise', invest in single-plug surge protectors to minimise the effect of your fridge / freezers, washing machines etc.
October 20, 2007

Randy said:

 
I recently purchased a set of brand spanking new HDX101 adapters on eBay with the intention of using them to set up an additional Linksys WRT54G router in my home to expand my wireless network. The thought of not having to run a CAT5 cable across and through my home/attic was very compelling. However, upon installing the HDX101s all I can say is WOW....what a massive disappointment. No where in any documentation was it stated that these devices had to be installed on the same circuit and that routing through circuit breakers would result in the units not performing. I was stunned in disbelief when the English-speaking challenged tech informed me of this. I informed him that most, if not all, homes in the US are required by code to distribute power through numerous circuits for safety's sake and that it was unfathomable that Netgear would market a product touting virtually unlimited expandibility yet knowing the ridiculousness of such a constraint. This is the first Netgear product that I have purchased and will reluctantly purchase others in the future. I suppose I'll be running a cable in the near future.

BTW...regarding the quality of wiring issue. My home is only two years old with 200 amp service distributed through approximately 20 circuits (ie circuit breakers) wired to appropriate building codes.
December 02, 2007

nico said:

 
Interesting various results here. I'm using the hdx101 units in my circa 1930 house across 2 separate breakers with very fast results
December 13, 2007

Steve said:

 
Same here. My house (UK) was built in the 1930's and the wiring is perhaps 20 years old. Using 2 HDX101s on 2 different floors on opposite sides of the house (about as far apart as you can get and still be in the same house) and I get 105-107Mbps transfer rates. I'm very happy with them.
December 19, 2007

RolandStone said:

 
I use HDX101b's in my 4-floor condo. From basement to loft I am able to stream video across circuit breakers with no issues. I've got my TivoHD networked into one and I can stream HD video from the computer in my loft to my living room Tivo quite nicely.
December 22, 2007

Guppy said:

 
A note about the DS2 chipset used in these -- they can also automatically serve as repeaters. So, if you add a 3rd unit between your existing two, it will serve to boost the connection between them. For HDX101's, this functionality was enabled in the v1.1 firmware.

By "between", this usually means as close to the breaker panel as possible, as a house's wiring typically branches off from there in a star topology. I don't know if Greg Keene still checks out this article, but if so, I'd like to ask if he could try plugging in a 3rd unit in his Garage-to-Bedroom setup and see if things improve.
December 31, 2007

Matt,Rat said:

 
I was debating picking up 150 feet of cat5 cable and then i saw the HDX101's. I figured, what do you want for $160....quality?
I plugged one in downstairs at my router and one upstairs and they are screaming fast. My place is about 12 years old and has 20 amp Romex. I would think that the higher capacity (amperage)wiring the structure has, the better your transfer rate will be. A lot of the newer homes have skimpy thin wiring to save on costs. Maybe 15 amps at best running through them. A lot of the older structures have larger gauge electrical wiring which might be why the HDX's run faster in some of the older houses. So far, so good.

Cheers.
April 22, 2008

Boris said:

 
I have a 14 year old home. I'm getting 109 TX and 140 RX.
May 20, 2008

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev

TechDigs.net Privacy Policy

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.